[Management of late onset septic complications after IPOM implantation: case series from a hernia center]. / Management septischer Spätkomplikationen nach IPOM-Implantation: Fallserie aus einem Hernienzentrum.

BACKGROUND: The intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) is for many surgeons a pragmatic solution for the operative treatment of extensive and complex abdominal wall hernias. A few years after mesh implantation we are now faced with a number of late complications of the IPOM procedure. Chronic septic complications, such as mesh infections and fistula formation have an outstanding position. OBJECTIVE: With this case series we would like to share our experiences with the operative treatment of severe late onset septic complications after abdominal wall augmentation with IPOM. Furthermore, the current indications for the IPOM procedure are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the period February 2016-July 2019 a total of 10 patients with late septic complications after IPOM implantation were treated in our clinic. The index interventions took place between 2010 and 2017. The clinical picture varied from mesh infections with only minor symptoms to formation of multiple intestinal fistulas. RESULTS: Multiple stage procedures were required in 9 out of the 10 patients in order to achieve sufficient decontamination of the surgical field. Due to enterocutaneous fistulas, bowel resection was performed in 5 patients. The mesh could be preserved in situ in only one patient. For the reconstruction of the abdominal wall, both plastic surgical methods and implantation of absorbable and non-absorbable meshes were used. CONCLUSION: A consistent treatment with great effort is required for septic complications of the IPOM procedure. The interventions are often associated with extensive adhesiolysis and intestinal resection. Therefore, the indications for intraperitoneal mesh implantation should be handled with caution and an alternative surgical procedure should be considered. There are still special cases, such as hernias with very large abdominal wall defects in which the IPOM method is a suitable treatment option for tension-free reconstruction.

[Challenges in visceral medicine during COVID-19]. / Herausforderungen der Viszeralmedizin bei COVID-19: Erfahrungen aus einem Krankenhaus der Grund- und Regelversorgung.

BACKGROUND: The worldwide dissemination of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a relevant problem for the German healthcare system and the whole of society within only a few weeks. Because visceral medicine is at the focal point many adjustments in procedures are necessary. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Necessary organizational structures and challenges in visceral medicine are described for urgent abdominal surgery after screening and for patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Therefore, an analysis of the current and relevant literature was performed and changes in the procedures in a hospital for basic and standard healthcare in Lower Rhine are described. RESULTS: This article describes the organizational structures and changes in a German hospital facing the crisis and management during the pandemic. These include establishment of a corona screening center at the hospital's main entrance and a multidisciplinary crisis management team. Specific internal guidelines were formulated for the management, confirmed by international experience and studies and regularly changed due to the requirements of the situation. CONCLUSION: In comparison to other countries the crisis reached hospitals in Germany with a clear delay and a relatively mild course. In order to be prepared for severely ill patients, adequate preparations could be made to meet the challenges on intensive care units, isolation wards, operating theaters and in endoscopy. The primary goal was the safeguarding of patients and employees. In the light of the pandemic medical rituals and habits need to be reconsidered.

Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: is there such a thing as being too old?

INTRODUCTION: The overall increase in life expectancy causes a rapid increase in number of elderly patients needing colorectal surgery. It remains unclear if there is a significant risk factor in patients over 80 years of age for postoperative morbidity and mortality. For this reason we investigated the perioperative, outcome and long-term survival after surgery for colorectal cancer in our hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a database containing information about patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2015 at the St. Bernhard Hospital in Kamp-Lintfort, Germany. The last follow-up date was 31th of December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were enrolled and analysed in this study. All patients were separated in tow groups depending in age. The first group was ≥80 years old (n=49). The second group was <80 years old (n=183). High ASA-Scores (≥3) were detectable more often in elderly patients (p<0,05). Elderly and young patients had a similar risk for postoperative anastomosic leakages (p=0,047). Likewise there were no significant differences regarding the Dindo-Clavien-Classification (p=0,13). The mortality within the first 30 days after surgery was significant elevated for elderly patients compared to younger patients (p=0,04). Also the overall 1-year survival was 90% for the younger and 73,5% for the older study group (p<0,05) Conclusion. Both the short-term outcome and long-term survival rate after colorectal surgery for cancer are worse for patients older than 80 years of age. After interpretation of all data it remains unclear if the age itself is still the biggest risk factor. When old patients have a good ASA-Score and no severe comorbidities, colorectal surgery remains safe even for patients older than 80 years.